Talk:Maryland Route 615/GA1
Appearance
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 21:47, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
Infobox[edit]
- No issues
Lead[edit]
- No issues
Route description[edit]
- No issues
History[edit]
- No issues
Junction list[edit]
- No issues
References[edit]
After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put the article on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix the issue with the dead link above. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 22:48, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review, Rp0211. I have corrected the dead link. VC 23:18, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- Since the issue has been addressed, I feel confident passing this article now. Keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 22:18, 28 June 2012 (UTC)