Talk:Mauro De Mauro/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: AGK [•] 22:44, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- Italian sources are not ideal, but nevertheless meets WP:V; no obvious factual errors or content of questionable accuracy.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- Covers all aspects of the subject matter in adequate depth.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Satisfies WP:NPOV
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No ongoing edit wars or substantial expansion of the article. Incident is not a current one and is not rapidly unfolding.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Few images, but all are properly licensed.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Engaging topic matter. Going forward, I'd recommend working on the layout and especially on the prose and writing. For now, though, this meets the GA requirements. Great work!
- Pass/Fail: