Talk:Max-Hellmuth Ostermann/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:51, 31 December 2009 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

For some reason my questions weren't displaying. I presume that he did get married. A date would be good. Did he have a child?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:17, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately the sources at my disposal do not give me more insight into his personal life. If you know of some more sources to consult I will gladly do so. The story about him getting married is a side note in Bergström's book. If resolving this is a show stopper for GA, so be it. I can't change it even if I wanted to. MisterBee1966 (talk) 13:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At least you've managed to find something out about his private life. However, be advised that you should get more detail on it if you want to take this to A-class or better.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:50, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]