Talk:Maybe This Christmas Too?/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 22:16, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Why not? o-<:-}}}

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   too much needless repetition, eg in "Background and composition", in four sentences you use four times "Maybe This Christmas Too?". You can replace with "it", or "The song" in the second paragraph.

I replaced one appearance of the album title. MTCT is now used three times, once in the first sentence and a second time to re-establish the subject after mentioning other albums in the series with similar names. The album title is also used when differentiating between the three versions of the Barenaked Ladies song. If you feel this is still too repetitive I'd be happy to play with the wording further. --Another Believer _(Talk) 18:18, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Ok, thanks.

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

2. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

4. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

6. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• Dabsolver check: ok
• Checklinks check: ok
• Reflinks check: ok
• Just this and I'll give you the green icon ;)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.