Talk:Memory address register

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

A register that points to a register that points to an address - this sounds a little bit too complicated. --Abdull 13:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A register that points to a register How a register can point to another register. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sudipta006 (talk • contribs) 18:45, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In my Network+ book by Tamara Dean, she calls this area a "memory range" when she talks about where a NIC and CPU agree to share data in RAM. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.101.153.191 (talk) 19:38, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In x86 processors

Are SI and DI registers appropriate examples? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:09, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article refers to the term "CPU" but does not seem to recognize or allow for the concept of multi-core and parallel computers as well as other any other types. It should probably be nominated as historical, and a new article created for the broadest concept of what a "computer" is (if this concept does not already exist in Wikipedia), as well as the known sub-concepts of this broadest concept of "computer". In fact, IMHO, this general process of starting with the broadest concept and creating sub-concepts (as separate Wikipedia articles) in a multi-level tree root type structure (or a network structure) should probably be used for at least most of the concepts explained in Wikipedia. Such consistently used structures would also allow AI to use Wikipedia much more effectively. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjalexand (talk • contribs) 16:42, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]