Talk:Memory rank

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Rank is like a chipselect is that correct ?

No, its not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.203.144.35 (talk) 16:23, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

would be nice to have a table with the diff configurations of current popular usage, eg, if you're running with 192 GB you'd typically buy quad rank. (totally made that up btw)

Older terminology[edit]

I think this hould be in the article: until about 10 years ago, that what is now called a rank was also called a bank, but then the term rank was invented to distinguish it from what is still known as a bank. --MrBurns (talk) 15:47, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]