Talk:Metaphysical Club (New Thought)

Resurrected

I have resurrected this article after an undiscussed redirect by User:Hrafn, who did not move the content to the redirect target. This topic may be non-notable, but if so, the article should be nominated for deletion so that all editors can discuss the matter. Thanks, Madman (talk) 15:12, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Madman2001: your edit is WP:POINT as you have already been told (both at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Archive 45#Using a redirect as a method of deletion. and Talk:Church of Divine Science#You can't just delete an article like this, Hrafn) that WP:REDIRECTs are not "deletions" and do not require an AfD. For your information, this article contains no third party references, and its sole reference does not verify the statement cited to it. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk 15:42, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm working on improving the article. I've already added another reference and citation. It's hard to see how this could be construed as "disrupting Wikipedia to make a point". Help out, Hrafn -- together we could turn this into a first-class article. Madman (talk) 16:01, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You replaced a related-party source that does not verify the statement (but at least mentions the topic) with a third-party source that not only doesn't verify the statement but doesn't even mention the topic. I am 'helping' by ensuring that is not misrepresented in order to prove a WP:POINT. Not helping you perhaps, but certainly helping wikipedia. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk 16:17, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]