Talk:Metroid: Zero Mission/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

Review by Drilnoth (talk · contribs)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   The two "software sales. NPD" refs could use some clarification, but that's about the only real problem I see, and it won't make or break the nomination.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Great work! -Drilnoth (talk) 03:55, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Alright, I will try to clear those two references up and wikilink them as well. Gary King (talk) 04:25, 13 February 2009 (UTC)