Talk:Michael Kremer/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: RegMonkey (talk · contribs) 20:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Reviewer: Closed Limelike Curves (talk · contribs) 18:50, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Knocked it out of the park on this one. This is great, and I love the article! I think it would even make a great FA nominee. :)
- 1. Well written?: Pass
- 2. Verifiable?: Pass
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Pass
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
- 5. Stable?: Pass
- 6. Images?: Pass
My only recommendation for improvement would be to try rewording it more simply in a couple parts. Politics and the English language and the Hemingway editor are great resources for this. That said, "imperfect wording" is whatever the opposite of "damning with faint praise" would be.–Sincerely, A Lime 18:50, 17 May 2024 (UTC)