Talk:MicroEmulator/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Appsoft4 (talk · contribs) 04:41, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: ForksForks (talk · contribs) 18:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
Unfortunately, I am going to fail this good article nomination, because it is a long way from meeting some of the good article criteria. However, you shouldn't be discouraged -- your article is a good starting point for a well rounded article. Here are the problems I see:
- The lead is very short, and contains citations. The lead should summarize the content of the article
- The history section is barebones and contains several unsourced statements. We prefer to see paragraphs with detailed info. See the essay WP:PROSELINE for helpful advice (though PROSELINE is not a guideline)
- Contains a user guide (see the policy WP:NOTGUIDE
- The extensive feature list is too technical for a wikipedia article.
- Some statements are cited up to 7 times. See WP:CITEKILL
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.