Talk:Mina (Italian singer)/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk) 02:59, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

After reviewing the article, I have decided to pass it because it meets all of the good article requirements in my opinion. Here is why:

1. Well-written:

The first part of the good article criteria is that it is well-written. I noticed the article was very well written, and is good article status. However, I suggest changing the format of dates (instead of 30 March, put March 30). Other than that, it meets that requirement for sure. Also, the formatting was correct for an article about a musician.

2. Factually accurate and verifiable:

a) It provides several reliable sources to fit the size of the article.

b) It uses the proper format when citing a fact.

c) No original research used.

3. Broad in its coverage:

a) Addresses main ideas of topic all throughout the article.

b) Stays focused on the subject, and does not add unnecessary facts.

4. Neutral:

Has a neutral point of view all throughout the article. Shows facts, and has opinion only in quotes.

5. Stable:

There are no edit wars and it stays constant every day.

6. Images:

There is only one image in this article. When you have time, I would try to find more images to make this article more verifiable and more historically significant.

Overall, this is a very good article that is worth good article status. Fix these two little things I mentioned above, and this article will be better. Rp0211 (talk) 04:00, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have referred this rather inadequate review for community reassessment. I am requesting that Rp0211 does not undertake further reviews until they can demonstrate that they undertsnad the process. Reassessment page is at WP:Good article reassessment/Mina (singer)/1. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 09:24, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]