Talk:Ministry of Planning (Cambodia)

Ministry of Planning (Cambodia) is part of WikiProject Cambodia, a project to improve all Cambodia-related articles. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group on Wikipedia, aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Cambodia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.CambodiaWikipedia:WikiProject CambodiaTemplate:WikiProject CambodiaCambodia articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Cambodia To-do:

Let us work in the best reference and presentation of archaeological sites of Cambodia beyond Angkor like Sambor Prei Kuk, Angkor Borei (Takeo), etc.

Should disambiguate Republican Party for Democracy and Renewal and generally try to link up social conscience with right-wing values.

I'm looking for the best picture or any informations about the KAF's U-6 (Beaver). It seem that the KAF had 3 aircrafts. But in 1971, during the viet cong's sapper attack at the Pochentong Air Base,at least 1 Beaver was destroyed.In 1972 at leat 1 Beaver was refurbished with a new engine. http://www.khmerairforce.com/AAK-KAF/AVNK-AAK-KAF/Cambodia-Beaver-KAF.JPG

Thankfull for this info. [Unsigned]

Deletion, moving, undo move, maintain redirect...

Not only has an editor moved this page from Ministry of Planning, Cambodia, he or she has also requested that the redirect be deleted. Like most of the other government ministries 'round the world, this page was named with the Ministry name first followed by the country; please check any category in Category:Ministries by portfolio to verify. The deletion of the redirect page seems irresponsible. I am requesting that the page be moved back to where it was, before it was moved less than an hour after it was created. Thanks. --Mr Accountable (talk) 08:21, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I restored both pages. I don't think this is the correct naming convention, but I'm not going to get into it at this point. §FreeRangeFrog 09:00, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]