Talk:Moltke-class battlecruiser/GA1
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Moltke class battlecruiser/GA1)
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- Comments
- It's a German ship. They used and use the metric system, so all data must also be given in SI units(you can keep other units as additional information).
- The all-big-gun battleship concept should be linked and it merits an explanation why Tirpitz wanted ten smaller guns instead of eigth big. That's taotally against the zeitgeist. Wandalstouring (talk) 09:22, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- I flipped the armor figures in the infobox, but couldn't find any others that weren't metric first. Can you point them out? I linked to "all-big-gun" and added a footnote explaining it. Tirpitz thought that the 28cm guns were sufficient to fight even battleships, and that since the German fleet was always at a numerical disadvantage, it would be better to have more guns rather than larger guns. I added that explanation to the article (not sure how/why I missed that previously). Thanks for your comments. Parsecboy (talk) 12:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- All issues with the measurement units have been solved.
- I flipped the armor figures in the infobox, but couldn't find any others that weren't metric first. Can you point them out? I linked to "all-big-gun" and added a footnote explaining it. Tirpitz thought that the 28cm guns were sufficient to fight even battleships, and that since the German fleet was always at a numerical disadvantage, it would be better to have more guns rather than larger guns. I added that explanation to the article (not sure how/why I missed that previously). Thanks for your comments. Parsecboy (talk) 12:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- References needed:
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
Wandalstouring (talk) 15:58, 25 March 2009 (UTC)