Talk:Moral blindness/GA2

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I've put on the Talk page a long list of concerns about this article. I think it was awarded GA on the basis of a very superficial review and that it is a long way below GA quality. Principal objection was that most of the sources are not about moral blindness, so the article as a whole is a personal essay or interpretation. I gave some time for other editors to improve the article up to GA standard, but since then it's hardly been edited and frankly I forgot about it until now. There is still a chance to improve the article but if it is not improved then the GA badge needs to go. MartinPoulter (talk) 20:11, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

With no progress after eight days, I'm closing this. The article is no longer GA. MartinPoulter (talk) 17:42, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]