Talk:Mother of Kings

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historial Novel or Historical Fantasy?

Is there any merit to recharacterizing Anderson's novel (which it undoubtedly is) as a historical fantasy? Anderson introduces the old Norse gods as well as magic (actually Finnish magic) as real characters on the same level as the humans involved. That usage is entirely consistent with the sources from the sagas, but it seems to me that "historical novel" gives a slightly different connotation to the elements that make up such a novel. In a historical novel, the characters may be believe in magic or accept its existence, but the author (or narrator's voice) generally does not. (Josephine Tey once called the best historical novels "history with conversation".) Tor, the publisher, labelled the book as a "historical fantasy". Originalylem (talk) 13:58, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]