Talk:Mount Pleasant Road/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Dough4872 01:19, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- "Until recently, Jarvis extended north to Bloor", the term "recently" assumes it in relation to today, but will become outdated over time. Can different wording be used here? The phrase "The road jogs slightly west south of Blythwood Road" sounds awkward and should be reworded. The first paragraph of the History section contains a few short sentences that should be combined.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Citation needed for "The construction of the Vale of Avoca through the first half of the 1920s prompted the newly formed Toronto Transit Commission to extend the St. Clair streetcar line east to Mount Pleasant Road and then north to Eglinton Avenue. The road was paved at this time as far north as Eglinton."
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Can some mention to the physical surroundings of the route be added to the route description? In addition, can a hatnote be added in the Major intersections table indicating the road is in Toronto.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
I will place the article on hold for a few fixes to be made. Dough4872 01:19, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- I've fixed all the issues (as well as a few consistency errors of my own). Thank you for the review! Cheers, ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 04:05, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- I will now pass the article. Dough4872 04:35, 9 January 2011 (UTC)