Talk:Mumbai Mirror/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: -ink&fables (talk · contribs) 16:25, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
The article looks really good. Would leave a review very soon. -ink&fables «talk» 16:25, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
@Tayi Arajakate: The article was really easy to review because of its quality. There are few #Suggestions which I would like to share. Please let me know if you disagree with anything proposed. -ink&fables «talk» 06:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- I didn't found any grammatical mistake. It does follow all the MoS, word choices are good, and definitive words are properly linked to respective Wikipedia article. This article doesn't have any list. -ink&fables «talk» 06:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- All the facts and statements are very well supported with reliable sources (and almost all the cited websites/newspapers have Wikipedia article). I didn't detect any OR and copyvio. -ink&fables «talk» 06:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- It does cover all the major aspects considering the topic. It is focused as well. -ink&fables «talk» 06:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- In my opinion the article is neutral as well. -ink&fables «talk» 06:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- I did found there was an edit war last year, but it is stable as of now. -ink&fables «talk» 06:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- The logo used in the infobox has been tagged for re-creation into a svg file, but that doesn't matter here.
The image used in the infobox don't have a caption.-ink&fables «talk» 06:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- The logo used in the infobox has been tagged for re-creation into a svg file, but that doesn't matter here.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Suggestions
[edit]- Infobox
- Add caption for image using parameter '| caption =' [for reference see The Jakarta Post]
- For 'type =' parameter; I think adding 'Weekly newspaper' with time period in brackets along with "Daily newspaper (2005–2020)" using unbulleted list or plainlist will be a good idea.
- Downsizing
- Metropolitan Media Company Ltd → Metropolitan Media Company Ltd. OR Metropolitan Media Company Limited
- References
- Archive all the references
- [6]: Add wikilink to Newslaundry
- External links
- Use Template:Official website for official website
- Remove from India-newspaper-stub category
Verdict
[edit] Waiting for the improvements and comments (if any) from the nominator. -ink&fables «talk» 06:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
On hold
- -ink&fables, I've implemented the suggestions except the one about type parameter. The paper hasn't started publishing as a weekly, at present it only exists as a website. It's likely they will only start publishing next year. None of this has been documented by reliable secondary sources yet so I can't add that in the article either. I also seem to be unable to use IABot right now, don't think archiving is necessary for a GA? Tayi Arajakate Talk 07:26, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- No, archiving is not necessary for GA but a good practice in my opinion. Congratulations!! on your successful GAN. -ink&fables «talk» 07:39, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- Alright, thank you for taking the time to review the nomination! Tayi Arajakate Talk 07:44, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- No, archiving is not necessary for GA but a good practice in my opinion. Congratulations!! on your successful GAN. -ink&fables «talk» 07:39, 9 July 2021 (UTC)