Jump to content

Talk:Music of the Mana series/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

I haven't got much to say here really: it's well written and on par with your previous discography articles, and feel you did a solid amount of work on it. It's surprisingly thought provoking too, as this is a series that's rather easy to overlook in light of other mainstream series. Nicely done!--Kung Fu Man (talk) 23:26, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]