Talk:No

First entry seems like a dicdef

The first entry here seems like a dictionary definition that should more appropriately be in Wiktionary. Aliajacta (talk) 22:55, 12 August 2010 (UTC) the second entry seems like a difficult dictionary of 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.135.167.213 (talk) 03:54, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. I have revised the opening accordingly. John Maynard Friedman (talk) 12:17, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

usage

Betteridge's law of headlines: "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no."

Why was this removed? What part of "no" do you not understand? —Pawyilee (talk) 01:29, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

This is a wp: disambiguation page, listing the articles that may be relevant to a search. Amendments such as you propose belong in one of those articles, not this one. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 12:22, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

You cannot to title article new section exist talk page editing calling talk no — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8000:1466:A700:2D23:9190:FF05:B90B (talk) 10:33, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

 Not done. Please give the name of an article that you believe should be included in the list. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 12:22, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Norway

Norway should be in geography, in my opinion of course. Qwerty3521 -- Message me here 22:44, 7 October 2021 (UTC)