Talk:New Don Pedro Dam/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Northamerica1000 (talk · contribs) 13:44, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support – The article appears to meet criteria at Wikipedia:Good article criteria. The article is complete, informative, well-written and comprehensive. Information is properly sourced with inline citations, and there doesn't appear to be any original research within it. The prose is neutrally worded and encyclopedic. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:44, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Northamerica1000's evaluation of this article:

1. Well written?:

Pass

2. Factually accurate?:

Pass

3. Broad in coverage?:

Pass

4. Neutral point of view?:

Pass

5. Article stability?:

Pass

6. Images?:

Pass