Jump to content

Talk:New Games Journalism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

this has got to be one of the most pretentious, idiotic articles in wikipedia.

'games journalism' involves being payed to cover certain products, and to say that you like them.

That is your opinion, not fact. As far as Wikipedia is concerned, games journalism is whatever people say it is. And there are people saying it is this. --Tom Edwards 15:11, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
So under what category would you place a scathing game review that I wrote just now, and without any payment. Games journalism perhaps? --wht.rbt

Has anyone actually ever refered to traditional games journalism as "Old Games Journalism"?

The UK Resistance drafted an "Old Games Journalism Manifesto". Not quite sure if this is where to phrase was first coined, but it does exist. --Sqrfrk 1:46PM, 13 February 2006 (PST)

Neither “game journalism” nor "new game journalism" hasn't anything to do with just writing about games. I hate to see that a few fan-boys are arguing around "journalism". Come on, they aren't journalists in the true meaning of the word, but the call themselves "new game journalists".

It's just a piece of crap, invented to attract media. Assholes!

There is a very large difference between journal-ism and journal-ing. The relation of subjective experience falls under the latter. This is journal-ing. Definitely not "new" though. Agree heartily with above comment.


Can anyone tell me why DailyRaider.com was mentioned here? I got rid of it, since I've never seen it anywhere else, and it's not even in the top 1,000,000 on the Alexa ranking. Seems like spamming to me, but if someone wants to prove me wrong, feel free. -al 07:32, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]



DailyRadar.com was a site that existed around 2000 or so. It disappeared along with many others during the infamous internet 'crash'. I'm too lazy to look in this page's history to see what context and how the site was mentioned. But at the very least, there's the answer to your question. Cheers. 4:26PM, 3 August 2006 (CST)


I put it back. It's definitly not DailyRadar.com. It checks out as a legitimate website.