Talk:New Jersey Route 168/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Arsenikk ^(talk) 00:06, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some comments:

The second sentence is four and a half lines on my screen, and far to long for anyone to grasp.
One really tricky detail is that south-east (where the latter modifies the former) use hyphens (-), while north–south (indicating disjunction or from to) use an endash (–). (I know that's picky, but it's nice to know ;) Fixed.
I know the article needs an image for GA, but File:I-295 NJ 168 exit.jpg is pretty bad and for my sake I would let the map qualify as illustration. But I'll leave that for your judgment.
Looking at the history, the sources and the comment by Mitch on the talk page, I will allow the article to pass. I am more concerned about the lack of post-1959 history than a gap in the last half of the 19th century. It is also a matter of there actually being available secondary sources to establish history. I agree that it is a bit little for FA thought.

Could you look into that one sentence, and I'll pass the article. Arsenikk ^(talk) 00:06, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I split the sentence into three. Dough4872 (talk) 00:34, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations with a good article. Arsenikk ^(talk) 08:55, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]