Talk:New York State Route 164/GA1

GA Review

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Something that did come up in my mind when I did this was that there is no current infromation. The newly updated NYSDOT site could have some project listed for NY 164. The lead could also use a bit more detail (the termini aren't even listed in that).

   B. Focused:

   Please cut the mention of original 164, not relevant to the current one.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   See below

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   I won't affect the GAN for it, but a picture would be useful. If there's any free ones it would be very helpful to the article.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

This article has some work to do it seems, but it should be easy to fix. Good luck!^Mitch32^contribs 10:40, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the review (finally!). I just checked, and NYSDOT has zilch on this route. Other issues have been fixed. Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 14:29, 21 June 2008 (UTC)