Talk:Nicholas Hoult/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 11:02, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article. Thank you. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 11:02, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"to study English," — English literature? if so, write it that way.

It is never really specified.

"and earned him a BAFTA Rising Star Award nomination" — For which one? Single Man or COTT?
Wikilink "Dame" and "borough" for those who may not be aware of the terms.
I may be wrong but shouldn't the years during which these TV series were broadcasted be included?

Not really, the longevity is always changing and the years can be misleading as to how long the subject was a part of the series.

"when he starred, alongside Hugh Grant, in Chris and Paul Weitz's comedy-drama film About a Boy." — Add the year for About a Boy in the article's body
"ferociously bright and articulate but sexually confused sixth-former" — Who said this? Hoult or critics? Do clarify.
"Hoult's performance was poorly received by such film critics as Mary Pols, Justin Chang and Richard Roeper." — Wikilink Chang and Roeper. Pity Pols doesn't have her own wikipedia article.
"the "beautiful" scenery helped to tell story better." — "the "beautiful" scenery helped to tell the story better."
Wikilink critics who have wikipedia articles (example: Robbie Collin)
Write "Relativity" as "Relativity Media" and wikilink it.
The Prestige was a 2006 film, not a 2015 one.

Source Review

Archive Ref no. 39
Reformat Ref no. 6, 10, 77, 101, 102, 104, 105
The archived URL for Ref no. 104 shows "Error". Fix it or find another reference.
Author's name not included in Ref no. 8, 87, 97

Good job on the article, Numerounovedant. Once these comments are addressed, the article will be promoted. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 13:39, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've (hopefully) fixed everything Ssven2. Thank you for taking a look. VedantTalk 16:01, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I still see the Bristol Post (Kaya Scodelario Maze Runner Preview one) shows "Error" for the archived URL. Fix it or find another reference. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 17:02, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for missing that, it must have been the numbering that confused me. I have removed the bit as it is isn't the most significant piece of information. VedantTalk 17:12, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
Pass or Fail:

Thank you for addressing the comments, Numerounovedant. Congratulations, the article has passed. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 17:17, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much Ssven2. VedantTalk 17:27, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]