Talk:Nick Bonino/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 1TWO3Writer (talk · contribs) 23:19, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Part of the August 2023 backlog.

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Did some mild copyediting for readability.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Lead contains only info found in body and is good proportionately to the article. Layout also good. Merged the medalbox with main infobox. Kept image in general chronological area.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	No issues.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Fixed a ref which had the wrong archive date. Spot-check went good.
	2c. it contains no original research.	Most sentences are followed by at least one citation while uncited statements have a relevant source in a following sentence.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	False positive cleared: statistical values in table not copyright or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	See below. Done.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Focus remains on subject.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	No issues.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Last edit not my own is from a few days ago.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	All images are own work available from Commons.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	All images show the subject in various points in his career, high-quality and very well-taken. I changed the captions to fit with WP:CAP.
	7. Overall assessment.

Spot-checks

• 1, 13, 26, 34, 45, 52, 69 (c/e info to be clearer), 71, 87, 90, 101, 115, 127, 133, 144, 159, 165, 172, 186, 198

No issues.

Possible issues

3a

• Needs more info about his tenure playing for the US national team in 2015 and 2023, even if brief. Perhaps could be in their own subsections? EDIT: I would also suggest adding this to the lead.
  • 1TWO3Writer, I believe I have addressed your concerns. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:34, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

  Indeed you have, good job! 123Writer ^talk 06:17, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.