Talk:Nights in Rodanthe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Filming Photo[edit]

I'm too lazy to do it right now, but anybody who wants to is welcome to use my photo of the filming, or at least a portion of the filming. It's a little blurry, but whatever. The catch is that I'm only providing a license for the Wikimedia foundation to use it, and I find the whole copyright thing baffling on Wikipedia when dealing with the tiny percentage of my photos that aren't Creative Commons licensed. So if you can figure out how to safely use this image on Wikipedia, based on my permission that it can be used (and I've put a note on the Flickr page to that effect), go for it.--WaldoJ (talk) 02:18, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you are only providing permission for Wikipedia to use it, unfortunately it can not be used as it is not a compatible license with GFDL. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 15:26, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that's too bad. Sometimes Wikipedia can be like hardcore FOSS fans—too devoted to ideology for their own good. Thanks for the response, though.--WaldoJ (talk) 01:10, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation in opening sentence...[edit]

No offense, but writing pronunciation the way the article currently lists, (pronounced Roe-DANTH-ee), is extremely un-encyclopedic. Pronunciation should be written in the International Phonetic Alphabet. What's currently in the article is next to useless as there are several ways to pronounce both "roe" and "danth" depending on how one normally stresses or un-stresses vowels. Wikipedia:IPA/Introduction.71.190.182.22 (talk) 05:24, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

soundtrack[edit]

I find the sentence about a song written for the movie but apparently not used in it a bit confusing. I thought a soundtrack was sound (esp. music) from a movie, not a proposed collection of sound (esp. music) for a movie. Or is this a case where the word has evolved like the crazy but meaningful "recorded live"?64.53.191.77 (talk) 10:24, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

horses[edit]

I know plot summaries are not supposed to be to involved, but shouldn't the previous dialogue about the wild horses (e.g., where the man says that, contrary to the woman, who has says there never (really) come this far down) that today they would see horses , though in fact they didn't. This was during the height of their falling in love/growing attached (which makes for much of the meaning of the horses appearing later -- though, of course, spelling the meaning out is taboo in Wik, since it is OR).64.53.191.77 (talk) 10:30, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]