Talk:No Me Queda Más/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: (CK)Lakeshade (talk · contribs) 01:34, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Multiple issues from the last GA nom have not been addressed.

• WP:LEAD: References should no be in the lead. [clarification needed] tag is still active.
• WP:OR throughout the article: Composition, Live performances, Track listing, Release history.
• Prose: Covers should be in prose, not chart, this is not a list. Critical reception and chart performance i could not even read through, there is no structure or flow. These should be two separate sections anyways.
• WP:NFCC issues: music video image fails, so does the sound sample.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

That tag was placed there by an unknown user. I am not sure why they tagged it because the sentence makes sense. But again I'll work on the article. Jonayo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 01:44, 7 October 2011 (UTC)