Talk:No Me Queda Más/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: (CK)Lakeshade (talk · contribs) 01:34, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple issues from the last GA nom have not been addressed.

  • WP:LEAD: References should no be in the lead. [clarification needed] tag is still active.
  • WP:OR throughout the article: Composition, Live performances, Track listing, Release history.
  • Prose: Covers should be in prose, not chart, this is not a list. Critical reception and chart performance i could not even read through, there is no structure or flow. These should be two separate sections anyways.
  • WP:NFCC issues: music video image fails, so does the sound sample.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
That tag was placed there by an unknown user. I am not sure why they tagged it because the sentence makes sense. But again I'll work on the article. Jonayo! Selena 4 ever 01:44, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]