Talk:No budget film

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Film (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon

I removed H.G. Wells' War of the Worlds by Timothy Hines since, in the article, it cited the film as being made for $50,000.00. As most films mentioned here were made for around $1.000.00, perhaps H.G. Wells' War of the Worlds belongs in the low-budget. rather than no budget category. YourInvisibleFriend 00:00, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

The Blair Witch Project is hardly a "no budget film". The director was allowed $30,000 for filming it initially and by the time it hit cinemas it had cost over $500,000. Enkidu6 (talk) 10:56, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Colin (zombie film)[edit]

Should Colin be added to the list? The fact that it was made for around £50 seems to be something noteworthy to the film (it's in its IMDb trivia, and I remember when it was being marketed interviews would always make mention of the budget) — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 19:58, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

New addition[edit]

Is there some special reason we should include Saptaswa Basu? The citation does not use the phrase "no budget film" anywhere, and the addition was quite promotional. I don't think he needs to be listed here. This article was nothing but an example farm until I pruned it down, and it's already starting to turn back into one now. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:37, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

I agree with NinjaRobotPirate that the edits by NeoSurya (talk · contribs) seem to violation WP:PROMO and WP:ADVERT. — Cirt (talk) 17:35, 17 November 2014 (UTC)