Jump to content

Talk:Nordhordland Bridge/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 18:15, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:16, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    I made a number of minor copy-edits.[1]
    Complies sufficiently with the MoS, prose is reasonably good.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Well referenced, assume good faith for off-line and Norwegian language sources. Those that I did access supported the cited statements.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Thorough, with unnecessary detail.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Stable
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Suitably licensed and captioned, I love the picture of the bridge in fog.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    An interesting article, I had not realised pontoon bridges of such size had been constructed. I am happy to list as GA. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 18:41, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for taking the time to review the article :) Arsenikk (talk) 19:53, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]