Jump to content

Talk:Odwalla/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Pass/Fail

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


The primary editor has done a great job upgrading the status of this article from a list to an informative article.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    All good here.
    B. MoS compliance:
    From what I have seen and read, yes it does meet the standards of the MoS.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    I have verified all the references.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    All references meet WP:RS, WP:PSTS and WP:V.
    C. No original research:
    It easily conforms to the standards of WP:NOR.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Coverage of the aspects of the company history, operations and products are present.
    B. Focused:
    I stays on target.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    It fully meets the the standards of WP:NPOV.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    Yes
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    All images have fair use tags
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    All images have descriptive captions
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Good job, hope the hard work has paid off.


--Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 18:01, 30 August 2008 (UTC)