Talk:Online reading

This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep.

No references, pure opinion, original research, and guesswork

I'm going to assume good faith here, and suggest that this article was created with good intentions by someone who knows nothing about how to write a Wikipedia article. It needs an immense amount of work. Timothy Perper (talk) 00:45, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added OR and Needs References templates. Timothy Perper (talk) 18:37, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The elimination of the original text and its replacement by a short discussion of the actual topic is worthwhile. I fixed some grammar and a typo. The current (new) version can be kept as a stub. Timothy Perper (talk) 15:03, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]