Talk:Operating model
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Inaccurate and Uncited Operating Model Definition
[edit]The definition of operating models in the first sentence is not cited. Quite frankly, it is not aligned with industry Business Architecture standards such as the Business Architecture Body of Knowledge (BIZBOK) Guide. The definition suggest that value delivery to the customer is part of an operating model. Value delivery is realized via a value stream and the value proposition it delivers to the customer. Value Streams are a key element in business architecture. However, the BIZBOK Guide make clear distinctions between Business Architecture and Operating Models. Business Architecture is strategically-oriented. Operating models are operational and resource oriented so the suggestion that operating models include value delivery to the customer is incorrect. The definition of operating models needs to be re-defined. Navy Brownshoe (talk) 04:06, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Original Research
[edit]While a great deal of the discussion on this page appears to be derived from Ross and Weill, there is considerable content that does not. This page appears to have some original research on it. I am concerned that it does not meet Wikipedia standards prohibiting original research. Nickmalik (talk) 17:37, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
The article has not been cleaned up since I added the comment above. I went ahead and tagged it for references and for general improvement. Nickmalik (talk) 01:23, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
File:CapabilityLandscapewithlabels.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]An image used in this article, File:CapabilityLandscapewithlabels.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:50, 31 August 2011 (UTC) |
beware of Link Spam
[edit]Removed "further reading" section due to WP:LINKSPAM Please do not add links to material that is not citable in Wikipedia, especially if it has not been referenced in the article itself. Citations to published works are fine. Nickmalik (talk) 07:04, 13 August 2014 (UTC)