Talk:Operation Lüttich/GA1
Appearance
GA Review[edit]
Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA, and should have the full review up within a few hours. Dana boomer (talk) 14:06, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- In the last paragraph of the "Background" section, you say "could find barely a fraction of these numbers". What's "barely a fraction"? Do you have any specific numbers, or even a ballpark figure?
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- The last half sentence of the first paragraph of the "Offensive strategy" section needs a ref.
- The last sentence of the second paragraph of the "Allied Air-Strikes—the offensive stalls" section needs a ref.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- The lead image PD template appears to be broken (it is redlinked). This should probably be fixed, so there aren't questions about the copyright. I noticed you're the uploader, so thought you'd probably be able to fix it fairly easily :)
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Overall, a nice article. There are just a few minor issues, so I am putting the article on hold to allow time for these to be dealt with. If you have any questions, you can ask them here on the review page or on my talk page. Dana boomer (talk) 15:24, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Everything looks good, so I'm passing the article. The question in the prose section, about the Background section, isn't enough to keep the article from passing GA, but it would be something nice to include in the article, so that can go on your list of things to do in the future :) Nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 20:14, 6 September 2008 (UTC)