Talk:Operations against the Mohmands, Bunerwals and Swatis in 1915

	British Empire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Indian / South Asia / World War I Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force
	World War I task force

Dislocation

The incidents in South Waziristan during November 1915 were not in any way connected with the earlier operations in Mohmand, Buner and Swat.
Khajuri Kach on the Gomal is some 200km from Shabkadr. The last sentence does not belong in this article.
FwdObserver (talk) 11:49, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Including '(1915)' in the title

To avoid any confusion with the earlier operations in Mohmand, Swat, and Buner, i propose moving this page unto Operations against the Mohmands, Bunerwals and Swatis (1915).
--FwdObserver (talk) 03:52, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]