Talk:Oral mucocele

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Dermatology task force.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Oral mucocele.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Comments

I can't find the book which is in referance Kahn, Michael A. Basic Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. Volume 1. 2001. I think something is missing here.

How about writing in readable English?

At the very least, the introduction, which presently is a mass of technical terms, ought to be comprehensible to a nonspecialist. (That is true of many WP articles.) Who can fix it? I have other things to do and I don't know what half those words mean. I'm a nonspecialist (that means my specialty is not medical). Zaslav (talk) 07:05, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Whole article needs rewriting. 94.196.232.219 (talk) 09:18, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mucocelesimple.png

BedrockPerson, given your history of creating a questionable diagram of oral ulceration please could you provide reliable references for this diagram, many thanks. Matthew Ferguson (talk) 15:09, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For one, history = one time. For references, see the fucking article. I'm sick of you and you alone policing what edits I do. I've had enough. BedrockPerson (talk) 16:43, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This diagram seems of a higher standard but I still have concerns with a few things. My comment above did not suggest that you have uploaded more than one questionable diagram. The WP:BURDEN of providing reliable sources for content you want to add is yours. There is entirely no need for abusive language. Matthew Ferguson (talk) 16:54, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The language I use often seems less passive-agressive when I type it out. So, sorry about that. I understand that BURDEN puts...well, burden...on the things that are posted to Wikipedia w/o direct citations, however my point, albeit strongly worded to perhaps a less-than-helpful degree, merely tried to state that the references needed are already cited in the article and thus are already attached to the diagram.

To specify, I actually used the references this time to make the diagram especially appropriate for use in this article, namely this paragraph:

The former is a swelling of connective tissue consisting of a collection of fluid called mucin. This occurs because of a ruptured salivary gland duct usually caused by local trauma (damage), in the case of mucus extravasation phenomenon, and an obstructed or ruptured salivary duct (parotid duct) in the case of a mucus retention cyst. The mucocele has a bluish translucent color, and is more commonly found in children and young adults.'

BedrockPerson (talk) 17:16, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

cross-section diagrams

Whilst I appreciate that the article does have some illustrations, I am hoping we may be able to add better cross-section diagrams in the future, showing the structure of these lumps, and the layers involved.-71.174.186.236 (talk) 16:58, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps some old circa-1900 pre-copyright medical science illustrations would be accurate enough to be useful to include.-71.174.186.236 (talk) 21:21, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]