Talk:Paleoendemism
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 9 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Camillegiuliano. Peer reviewers: Ellinap, Sidneysmiith, Domixox, MacStudent1.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:03, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 February 2019 and 31 March 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hmirts, Briannepalmer, Orcutt MGS.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:03, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Dominika's Peer Review
[edit]There is a strong start to the article, shown when defining the key words that are being explained. It could be useful to separate the article into sections, including headers such as history or reason behind paleoendenism or different countries which have example of paleoendenism. I don't recommend starting a sentence with "Because" it stops the flow of the article. Some good example of Paleoendemism but these could be sectioned off into separate sections. The article is neutral and does not favour a specific side. There is no concrete conclusion summarising paleoendenism, however, I presume this is because you have not finished yet. Very well done on your article! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Domixox (talk • contribs) 19:18, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Author's Peer Review - By user: OricaRyu
[edit]This article has a very well written and defined introduction to the topic by defining the terms and relating the general concept to subclasses and other related topics that may be of interest to the reader. Definitely a few corrections to be made in terms of sentence structure however, the general idea is well understood and interpreted correctly. Introducing headings and subheading to separate specific concepts could be beneficial as it would allow one to continue to expand on each subsection instead of cramming information in one specific heading. The tone is neutral throughout the article and as an incomplete article has a lot of room for expansion and revision. Very well done so far! OricaRyu (talk) 19:06, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]This is very well written. Very neutral fact-based content, with a great array of information. Everything flows well and the citations seem appropriate given the scientific nature of this topic.
In terms of improvements as the previous reviewers have stated it might be a good idea to use subheadings to separate your thoughts. i also want to suggest giving examples of Paleoendemism outside of island regions or at least adding other empty catgories for others to fill in (e.g causes of Paleoendemism). Linking more wikipedia pages discusing the movement of species would also greatly enhance your article.
overall a job well done.