Talk:Panjiva

Panjiva has been cited in many mainstream publications and has an original technology:

http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/133/a-morningstar-for-manufacturing.html

http://www.forbes.com/2009/02/12/panjiva-global-trade-opinions-contributors_0212_josh_green.html

http://www.supplychainmarket.com/article.mvc/Panjiva-Analysis-Confirms-Alarming-Trend-In-0001

http://www.apparelmag.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=23B25809E05B47A8B45DBB89E5A021CF&nm=&type=MultiPublishing&mod=PublishingTitles&mid=CD746117C0BB4828857A1831CE707DBE&tier=4&id=7E58166B4B9847A4B68A7AB3EDEB16CD

It seems like the kind of company that should be in wikipeida and after reviewing wikipedia's guidelines and the item in question I feel it deserves placement.

Yes, I can see now that the company is notable, it's just the article that is at fault. It really needs some more assertions of notability though (e.g. reliable sources, independent commentary etc). I might add some myself, actually. - Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 22:29, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

That's always the best first step! --GedUK  22:41, 21 March 2009 (UTC)