Talk:Paper Mario/GA1

GA Review

Any comments are welcome. LegoK^ontribsT^alkM 04:39, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Looks fine

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Has only 18 refs, but many are used more than once.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   All sources look reliable.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Talks about the game overall, not just the plot.

   B. Focused:

   Talks about the game, without straying.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Not an advert

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   History looks clean

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Would recommend using {{Non-free use rationale}}, but is fine the way it is.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Looks great