Talk:Paper or Plastic (song)/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I'll be reviewing the GA for "Paper or Plastic". I look forward to reading the article, and will adding to the review as I go :)! Giacobbe ^talk 19:46, 12 May 2017 (UTC) Reviewer: (CA)Giacobbe (talk · contribs) 19:46, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Overall

Quick question: Why are all of your sources archived? They are barely a year old lol.

It is always good to archive your sources to avoid link rot and link decay in the future. Aoba47 (talk) 22:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Images or quote boxes would help spruce the article up a bit.

I do not believe any additional images are necessary for this article; I cannot think of an additional image that would further illustrate the material beyond what is present in the text (especially since it is a very short article). There is actually a quote box in the "Music video" section. Aoba47 (talk) 22:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References should include both the work and the publisher, I've noted that several references are lacking such. I understand that some magazines and online media are published under the same name. In that case I would identify the publisher as such. For example 'Source Example Magazine' would be published under 'Source Example Inc/Ltd/LLC/etc'. Generally they state what they are published under (or their legal title) in the 'About Us' or 'Contact Us' section.

I am pretty sure the references are fine as they currently stand and contain the work and the publisher where appropriate. Aoba47 (talk) 22:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Intro

"It was released as the fourth promotional single from the record."

Change to "Paper or Plastic" or "The song" — You refer to "Paper or Plastic" as it in the previous sentence, and in the sentence immediately following the one I quoted, you refer to it as the track.

Revised. Aoba47 (talk) 22:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Critical response to the song was mixed; some music critics praised the sound while Mike Wass of Idolator criticized it alongside the other promotional singles for the album."

First bold — Change to "Paper or Plastic", same reasoning as above.
Second bold — Kinda sounds like you're giving Wass undue weight, might I suggest changing the sentence to - ""Paper or Plastic" garnered generally mixed responses from contemporary music critics; some praised the songs "unusually restrained" sound, while others criticized it alongside the album's previously released promotional singles.

Revised. Aoba47 (talk) 22:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"which Candy envisioned as a satire on political and socioeconomic repression of women and misogyny"

First bold — You can link to political satire.
Second bold — You can link to women's rights.
Third bold — You can link to as well misogyny as well.

Revised. Aoba47 (talk) 22:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Composition

An audio sample would also go a long way to help give the reader context.

Added. Aoba47 (talk) 22:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Final thoughts

Other than what I've stated above, everything looks to be very well done. Great work! Giacobbe ^talk 20:08, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review. I will fully address your points sometime over the weekend if that is okay with you. Aoba47 (talk) 20:10, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@(CA)Giacobbe: Thank you for your review! I believe that I addressed all of your comments. Aoba47 (talk) 22:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoba47: After reviewing the article a second time, I believe it meets all necessary criteria for GA status. Great work, Aoba47! Giacobbe ^talk 22:47, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.