Jump to content

Talk:Pearson plc/Archives/2014

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Introduction reads like an advertisement

The second paragraph seems more like an internal, Pearson discussion than relevant and useful information for the public. It also uses some jargon:

"accelerate their push into digital learning, education services and emerging markets. "

I'm not sure whether this is advertisement-like language, or just a bit off-topic, so I didn't want to apply a banner to the section without discussion.

Wulfcoen (talk) 10:55, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Early origins

A strange gap in the history: when did Pearson stop being a civil engineering firm? The history has them as engineers pure and simple until WWI; then immediately after the war buying most of a bank and several newspapers, and after that there's no indication it's anything other than a pure publisher. A very dramatic change to make in such a (relatively) short time - was it already a diversified holding company in 1914? Did it remain in engineering well into the twentieth century? Andrew Gray (talk) 17:14, 22 April 2014 (UTC)