Talk:Perseus (constellation)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Astrocog (talk · contribs) 15:31, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Starting review - please be patient.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   No problems here. Article is readable, with no glaring prose errors.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   Citations are well-done here. Excellent formatting.

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   Thorough referencing in this article.

   C. No original research:

   None that I could discern.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Hits the broad highlights

   B. Focused:

   No unnecessary tangents. Focused on the constellation and its stars/objects.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Seems to be fine. I checked into the claim on the talk page that the Staal reference is unreliable vis-a-vis Chinese lore, but I can find no supporting evidence for the claim. Should that issue resurface with good evidence, then that section should be revisited.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   Though some content (about 5K worth) was added this month, I think this article is still relatively stable. No evidence of edit wars.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   All images are fine.

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

   I added some alt text to images myself, which satisfies me on this requirement.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Quite a good article, and on its way to becoming FA class.