Talk:Peter Venkman

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 August 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Untitled

Should I put up a picture? Also, why is it so short!?--suit-n-tie 02:45, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because I just wrote it. Actually, I just rescued it from redirect hell. All the Ghostbuster characters were just redirects to the main Ghostbusters page, so I made individual articles for each (I havent gotten to Winston Zeddemore yet) and added a general description of the character. I started it and hopefully someone can expand it. Wavy G 04:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but what about a picture?--suit-n-tie 03:17, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

fck two Ghostbusters movies in the "Quotes" section of this article. Admittedly Venkman is one of the most quotable characters in movie history, but I think this section is now too long and unencyclopedic. It is also imbalanced in that there is only one quote from the Real Ghostbusters cartoon, even though the 140 episodes of that series represent the vast majority of Venkman's existence as a fictional character. Gildir 16:30, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Following up on my previous comment, I have been bold and deleted some of the quotes from Ghostbusters and Ghostbusters II, while adding a quote from the Real Ghostbusters episode "Drool, the Dog-Faced Goblin". Gildir 15:20, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There shouldn't really be any quotes, should there? Unless they're written as part of the article and given context, I mean. Quotes are what Wikiquote is for, really.--Joseph Q Publique 03:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Empire

The movie magazine Empire named him one of the greatest movie characters of all time. Worth a mention? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.89.108.51 (talk) 15:24, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

The Ghostbusters franchise and its characters are more memorable to me (and large part of my generation) than Superman. How come the notability of the characters featured is in doubt? I strongly feel that, if any manga character is acceptable, the Ghostbusters should be as well. Mfhulskemper (talk) 20:15, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is determined by coverage of the character themselves in reliable, third-party sources as demonstrated in the article, not the franchise, media type, etc. This article currently is purely plot and unsourced claims, showing no notability. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 22:13, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality of entry

The entry is really, really badly written (not so much in the first sections, but it becomes embarrassingly bad in the Appearances section). Large parts should be deleted or rewritten. 151.35.128.253 (talk) 10:27, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]