Talk:Pinkove Zvezdice

Notability

I see that another editor has reinstated the {{notability}} template that I removed. Don't these sources constitute significant coverage in independent reliable sources? It appears to me that this reinstatement of the template was based on some strange desire to deface the article with some sort of template at the top rather than on any lack of notability. The only templates that this article needs are the "stub" template and the request for more categories. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 20:30, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, those sources do not constitute significant independent and reliable coverage. Please read WP:GNG for more guidance. At present the article is at risk of being tagged for deletion as lacking notability. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:58, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm perfectly aware of WP:GNG. Could you please explain how those hundreds of news (note "news", not "web") sources don't constitute significant independent and reliable coverage rather than simply assert it as if it was a fact. If you don't believe that sources in Serbian rather than English can be used to demonstrate notability then please start a deletion discussion, where I'm sure that you will be corrected. You wrongly tagged this as needing more sources when everything was sourced and as an orphan when other articles link to it, so why do you insist on believing that you are right on this point? 86.17.222.157 (talk) 22:26, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Interwikis

Interwikis cannot be added while the page exists in two more languages: Serbian and Macedonian. --46.33.205.197 (talk) 18:49, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]