Talk:Plusle

Plusle was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 25, 2006, reviewed version). There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

AfD on Plusle and Minun

As a result of the discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plusle and Minun, the article Plusle and Minun has been reduced to the two links to the pages Plusle and Minun, removing the previous content. This previous content could be recovered from the history of Plusle and Minun and merged here. - Liberatore(T) 16:21, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Failing

No references.
Stubby sections.
Pokémon terminology not explained.
No fair use rationales
No manga or TCG sections
Not ready H ig hway ^{Rainbow Sneakers} 17:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Romanized name

I don't want to start an edit war, so I'll try to get this straightened out. Serebii lists the Romanized form of Plusle's name as "Purasuru," so I was under the impression that this was the correct name to place in the infobox. If I'm wrong, do tell. --Jitterro 03:14, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the problem is, Serebii is probably a reliable source for everything BUT Romanizations of the Japanese names—at least, the main site. I know nothing of the forums. Although I've heard it was Romanized "Prasle" in Japan (which that topic does indeed have). So whatever. Prasle then. The point though is yes, Romanization goes there, not Roma-ji.—ウルタプ 05:46, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

surely it should be "Plusle", same as the English? "purasu" is the japanese katakana equivalent of "plus", although it could be interpreted as "pras" that's hardly likely to be the intention considering the general plus-themed nature of this pokemon. 83.100.231.112 19:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, sure, they meant plus. But it's not our fault they ended up writing "Pras" all over everything instead.—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 22:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]