Talk:Pogonology

Does this deserve an article?

This is the tiniest stub I have ever seen. I don't know what could be added that isn't already covered in Beards. Are there famous pogonologists? Pogonology papers? At best, I think this article calls for nothing more than a subsection in the Beard article. Ztrawhcs 13:22, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This stub is nothing more than a dictionary definition. It says nothing that the beard article doesn't. I will redirect Pogonology to the beard article (and remove the former's link from the latter). 69.250.43.106 09:04, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing, to "Randomfrenchie", who defends this article (see comments in article history): if and when someone has something to put here besides a dictionary definition, he can certainly do so. However, even in that circumstance, that person should first consider adding his "beard study" material to the main beard article. 69.250.43.106 09:12, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]