Talk:Politics of Vietnam/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Oakley77 (talk · contribs) 01:59, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Review
[edit]- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources: (All the sources come from 3 different websites but still provide reliable info.)
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: (Every paragraph has at least one source/reference.)
- C. No original research: (No original research found.)
- A. References to sources: (All the sources come from 3 different websites but still provide reliable info.)
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects: (Covers all the details prior, during, and after the matches.)
- B. Focused: (Always stays on topic about the PPV.)
- A. Major aspects: (Covers all the details prior, during, and after the matches.)
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias: (No bias found.)
- Fair representation without bias: (No bias found.)
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc: (Took a look at the article history and everything seems to be fine.)
- No edit wars, etc: (Took a look at the article history and everything seems to be fine.)
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: (All the images are properly sourced and copyrighted. Non-free images have fair use rationales.)
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: (Captions and pictures are good)
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: (All the images are properly sourced and copyrighted. Non-free images have fair use rationales.)
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Very good article and I am also very impressed...PASS!!!--Oakley77 (talk) 02:13, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Please remember that contributions to this review are greatly encouraged!Oakley77 (talk) 02:13, 10 May 2012 (UTC)