Talk:Predator X

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles

for news sources. GARDEN 20:17, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Science references[edit]

Could we have some references to scientific journals instead of generic newspapers?188.100.205.226 (talk) 00:48, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't been following this all that closely, but I don't think it *has* been published scientifically yet. J. Spencer (talk) 22:50, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.nhm.uio.no/pliosaurus/english/

This page say "All the scientific results will be published in a full scientific paper later this year.". But I can't find any scientific paper. This year will be finished soon......--130.199.3.140 (talk) 02:14, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It could be the December issue of the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, I suppose. J. Spencer (talk) 23:50, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.bioone.org/toc/vrpa/29/4 no result ?

Apparently not. Well, there are other journals, and publication can be pushed back for various reasons. J. Spencer (talk) 22:59, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

99,000 pounds Jesus Christ that it is over 48 tons or almost as heavy as a megalodon.

And at 49 feet although most sights put it 50 feet it was almost as long to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.83.100.52 (talk) 19:55, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scientific Name[edit]

Has this species been given a scientific name yet? it's been a few years... are they still investigating this beast? --71.0.116.132 (talk) 00:48, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not yet. No formal paper has been issued yet from the discovery team. It may be they are being very careful to make sure this is not a very large specimen of an already identified taxon. HammerFilmFan (talk) 22:34, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's fortcomming. It will be published in the Norwegian Journal of Geology, likely in a double issue in October this year. Petter Bøckman (talk) 10:56, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]