Talk:Project A119/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Astrocog (talk • contribs • count) 00:24, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Review in progress.AstroCog (talk) 00:24, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Nice article overall. Does what it needs to do.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- Plenty of reliable references, well cited.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- No problems here.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- No problems here.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Seems fairly stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- It's got images. Not sure what other images could improve the article.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- This one was pretty easy. After reading
- Pass/Fail: