Talk:Project A119/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Astrocog (talk contribs count) 00:24, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Review in progress.AstroCog (talk) 00:24, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Nice article overall. Does what it needs to do.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Good writing overall. Prose gets to the point.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Plenty of reliable references, well cited.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    No problems here.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    No problems here.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Seems fairly stable.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    It's got images. Not sure what other images could improve the article.
  7. Overall:
    This one was pretty easy. After reading