Talk:Project Moonbase (podcast)
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Notability
[edit]Project Moonbase seems to be notable enough to merit its own article based on the following reasons:
- It is "one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style" (retrofuturism).
- The show has been running as long as the other shows highlighted in the history of podcasting article.
- The article has an appropriate level of detail, supported with inline sources.
- It acts as a broader gestalt article incorporating several separate entities that may not be notable separately, including: a radio show, a podcast, original music releases/performances, a television show, a graphic artist, a health campaign. (Hence, the normal advice to merge a non-notable subject in to another article has effectively already been followed.)
Also, I realise that many references are to the show's own website, but that's mainly for individual episodes, which seems pertinent. If I were to remove all links to individual episodes, then the references section would appear more balanced to a casual editor, but I don't think that an article should be criticised for being sourced thoroughly.
PhilipBroughtonMills (talk) 15:41, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Project Moonbase (podcast) page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Project Moonbase (podcast)" page.