Talk:Queen's University at Kingston/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Oakley77 (talk · contribs) 21:00, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Review

1. Well-written:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (prose)	Starting of with a pass...	✓ Pass
(b) (MoS)	Excellent	✓ Pass

2. Verifiable with no original research:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (references)	Many refs.	✓ Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)	Many as well	✓ Pass
(c) (original research)	Absolutely.	✓ Pass

3. Broad in its coverage:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (major aspects)	All vital points are covered.	✓ Pass
(b) (focused)	Very focused and "maintained".	✓ Pass

4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Notes	Result
Zero bias.	✓ Pass

5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Notes	Result
A pass here...	✓ Pass

6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)	Indeed.	✓ Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)	Captions suit the context.	✓ Pass

Result

Result	Notes
✓ Pass	A textbook higher education article.

Discussion

I will be reviewing this for a bit, but during that time, please feel free to comment and help make this article a GA one. I also will be completing the review at intervals, so if you see the review half-done, be aware it will be completed soon. Thanks for the comments and input!Oakley77 (talk) 21:00, 12 May 2012 (UTC)